Implementing the outcome of a review of a participation failure decision 001-10130020
For Participation Solutions Team (PST)-Subject Matter Experts (SME) or Appeals Support Team Service Officer (priority reviews)
This page contains information about implementing the outcome of a review of a decision made under either the Targeted Compliance Framework (TCF) or the Job Seeker Compliance Framework (JSCF).
On this page:
Implementing the outcome of a review of a TCF decision
Implementing the outcome of a review of a JSCF decision
Implementing the outcome of a review of a TCF decision
Table 1
|
Step |
Action |
|
1 |
Implementation instructions received + Read more ... After a review of a TCF decision is completed, the outcome is implemented by:
The decision must be implemented within:
For decisions relating to:
|
|
2 |
Participation suspension following a mutual obligation failure or work refusal failure + Read more ... If a decision to suspend payment for a mutual obligation failure or work refusal failure is set aside following a review of the decision:
Note: If the re-engagement requirement is already finalised, run the Appeal Decision Implementation script in Customer Record. This will update the Appeals (APL) system and create a DOC on the job seeker’s record noting that the re-engagement has been finalised. Procedure ends here. |
|
3 |
Financial penalty for a first or second mutual obligation failure in a failure group set aside within 13 weeks + Read more ... If the decision is to set aside:
When the decision has been made to set aside the job seeker's financial penalties, any subsequent failures in the same failure group are adjusted automatically by the system. When either, or both, of the first or second mutual obligation failures in the failure group is revoked and a third failure has also been applied, the third penalty automatically converts to the appropriate first or second failure. Procedure ends here. |
|
4 |
Financial penalty for a first or second mutual obligation failure decision in a failure group outside of 13 weeks + Read more ... If the decision is to set aside:
When the decision has been made to set aside:
Does the Penalty sequence need to be updated?
|
|
5 |
Update penalty sequence for failures outside of 13 weeks + Read more ... Update the penalty sequence using the Review Decision workflow:
Repeat the above penalty sequence update for all relevant failures. See Resources for penalty sequence examples. Procedure ends here. |
|
6 |
Cancellation of payment because of a third mutual obligation failure, work refusal failure, or unemployment failure + Read more ... If the decision is to set aside:
When the decision has been made to set aside If a decision that cancelled a participation payment is set aside, payment must be reinstated from the date of effect of the decision to cancel. This only applies when the application for review was lodged within 13 weeks of the decision being notified to the job seeker. The non-compliance cancellation and post cancellation non-payment periods are automatically lifted after the Review workflow is finalised. To allow background processing to take effect, clear out of the job seeker’s record. If the background processing is not successful, a manual follow up (MFU) activity with keyword TCFRES is created. For more information, see Participation Compliance Manual Follow Up Review guide. Procedure ends here. |
|
7 |
Failure to re-engage within 29 days decision set aside + Read more ... If a decision to cancel a payment because of a failure to re-engage within 29 days (CAN CDR) is set aside after a review:
Procedure ends here. |
|
8 |
An unemployment preclusion period at new claim + Read more ... If the decision to apply an Unemployment Non-payment Period (UNPP) is set aside after a review of the decision:
Note: if the 13 week favourable determination rules are met, the unemployment preclusion period is automatically lifted after the Review workflow is finalised. This may affect the new claim start date. Procedure ends here. |
|
9 |
Cancelling Services Australia started review decision transaction + Read more ... When a started review decision activity is no longer required, PST SMEs can update the status to cancelled in Process Direct as follows:
|
Implementing the outcome of a review of a JSCF decision
Table 2
|
Step |
Action |
|
1 |
Implementation instructions received + Read more ... After a review of a JSCF decision is completed, the outcome is implemented for: A non-priority review:
A priority review - by the Appeals Support Team. The outcome must be implemented within:
For decisions relating to:
|
|
2 |
Hardship provisions + Read more ... If a decision not to make payment under hardship provisions is affirmed following a review of the decision:
If a decision not to make payment under hardship provisions is set aside following a review of the decision:
Procedure ends here. |
|
3 |
Non-Attendance Reports (NAR) + Read more ... If a NAR is found to be invalid:
This will result in the following:
Procedure ends here. |
|
4 |
Review of connection failure, non-attendance, reconnection failure or No Show, No Pay failure Decision is affirmed + Read more ... When a decision is affirmed for a connection failure for non-attendance at a third party provider appointment, or failure to enter into a Job Plan following a review of the decision:
Decision is set aside + Read more ... When a decision to apply a connection failure, non-attendance failure, or reconnection failure is set aside following a review of the decision:
When a decision to apply a connection failure or suspension failure is set aside:
The Review Decision workflow will help to identify when adjustments to penalties are required. In some cases, an MFU will also be created if manual calculation of a penalty amount or arrears is needed. Manually calculate the job seeker's net entitlement for the affected periods. If necessary, correct the arrears or debt amount displayed. For more details, see How to manually calculate arrears. Reconnection failure penalty decision varied + Read more ... If the decision is varied, and the reconnection failure should be applied without penalty, the reconnection failure status should automatically change to 'applied without penalty'. This applies if the previous failures in the failure sequence were assessed as invalid. A failure is invalid if it was rejected or revoked using one of the following rejection codes:
Updating the status of previous failures If the rejection reason for a failure needs to be changed to show it is invalid:
To change the revoke reason recorded for a failure, use the Review Decision workflow. Note: when the rejection reason is updated on the BIDE screen to show a failure is now invalid, the system may not automatically change the subsequent reconnection failure status from 'Applied' to 'Applied without penalty'. If this occurs, manually update the reconnection failure status in the Review Decision workflow. Only take this action when all the previous failures in the same failure sequence are invalid. For further information, see Non-compliance with compulsory requirements - review and appeals. Implementing outcomes of a decision relating to a payment suspension (participation). If the outcome of a review/appeal is to restore payment, it must be restored back to the date of suspension. This applies when:
Procedure ends here. |
|
5 |
Cancellation of payment due to ongoing non-compliance + Read more ... Decision to cancel a payment because of ongoing non-compliance is set aside:
|
|
6 |
Unemployment Non-Payment Period (UNPP) or serious failure decision review Decision is affirmed + Read more ... If the penalty period was subject to Payment Pending Review (PPR), it generally recommences from the start date of the entitlement period following the one in which the decision was recorded (when it is within 13 weeks of the new decision). The job seeker will only need to serve the remaining balance of the non-payment period if they have already 'self-served' part of the UNPP:
In all other cases that were subject to PPR, the job seeker will be required to serve the full UNPP. Staff must:
Decision is to set aside + Read more ... Staff must:
Note: the job seeker's net entitlement may need to be manually calculated for the affected periods. Correct the arrears or debt amount on the Daily Rate Component (RAC) screen if required. The provider will be advised electronically that the failure (including serious failures for persistent non-compliance) has been re-applied or revoked. A letter will be issued to the job seeker telling them the outcome. Procedure ends here. |
|
7 |
Cancelling a Services Australia started re-engagement or review decision transaction + Read more ... When a started re-engagement or review decision transaction is no longer required, update the status to cancelled in Process Direct. Note: this only applies to Centrelink generated re-engagement transactions and review decisions. PST SMEs can update the transaction status as follows:
|