BasicsCard dispute resolution 103-01230100
This document outlines how to investigate a customer's BasicsCard enquiry and the escalation process if the enquiry cannot be resolved at first contact.
Escalation of BasicsCard dispute
This table describes the process steps to investigate and where appropriate escalate a customer's BasicsCard dispute. Portions of this process are completed by the Income Management Policy Helpdesk team only.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Customer/payment nominee contacts with a dispute about a BasicsCard + Read more ... Confirm the customer's identification before proceeding. For assistance, see Authenticating a Centrelink customer. Note: there is no requirement to sight or photocopy customer identity documents. If the payment nominee is contacting, confirm that:
If an income managed customer has a payment nominee, the BasicsCard will be issued to the payment nominee on behalf of the customer.
|
2 |
Discuss Issue + Read more ... Determine the nature of the enquiry or complaint and obtain information from the customer to assist in the resolution. Depending on the nature of the complaint, different information will need to be gathered. The following is a guide to the information a Service Officer will need to obtain. Transactions that have occurred after card loss:
Balance on card:
Disputed transaction:
Merchant Issues:
Card used fraudulently:
Can the dispute be resolved at first contact?
|
3 |
Dispute escalation + Read more ... Enter the customer's feedback into the Customer Feedback Tool ensuring all information obtained in Step 2 is included. Where the dispute cannot be resolved at first contact, it should be escalated through to Access Support, option 7. The Income Management Policy Helpdesk will assist to resolve escalated complaints where necessary. See Recording complaints and feedback in the Customer Feedback Tool and Complaints and feedback index Does the customer still have access to their BasicsCard?
|
4 |
BasicsCard incorrectly issued to a third party as a result of Services Australia error + Read more ... If a customer (or their payment nominee) contacts and claims a BasicsCard has been issued on their record to an unauthorised third party, ask whether the disputed card has previously been reported, and enquire as to the action taken. If not previously reported, go to the Card Action History screen - Income Management> BasicsCard> BasicsCard action history:
Go to the Transaction Summary screen, Income Management> BasicsCard> Transaction summary:
Once these checks are completed, does the customer still believe that the BasicsCard was issued to a third party in error?
|
5 |
Suspend the card + Read more ... If the BasicsCard is active, suspend the card. Annotate the DOC automatically generated by the suspension activity, advising that the card is not to be reactivated as it was issued to a third party in error. Note: it is preferable that a replacement card is issued rather than the incorrectly issued card being closed manually, as this would close the current BasicsCard account and all BasicsCard action history would be lost. |
6 |
Issue replacement BasicsCard + Read more ... Issue a replacement BasicsCard to the customer. This can be done face to face or by request via the Income Management line. This will close the incorrectly issued BasicsCard automatically.
Procedure ends here. |
7 |
Referring Escalated Complaint for a CDDA investigation + Read more ... Where an escalated complaint cannot be resolved through normal dispute resolution procedures, and there is sufficient evidence to indicate the customer may have lost money due to defective administration, they may be eligible to claim for compensation under the Compensation for Detriment caused by Defective Administration (CDDA) scheme. |
8 |
Supporting CDDA investigation + Read more ... For the Income Management Policy Helpdesk team only The Income Management Policy Helpdesk will liaise with the Service Zone and Compensation Management team to investigate the case, including details of disputed transactions and the issue of disputed BasicsCards. To support the investigation, statements from customers and Service Officers will be required to ascertain that the customer has suffered 'detriment' caused by the 'defective' action or inaction of the agency, and where the claimant has no legal or statutory right of redress. If a CDDA claim is granted following investigation, the Income Management Policy Helpdesk will:
Compensation granted under the CDDA scheme for lost Income Management (IM) funds must be returned to the Customer's IM account. |