Amending maintenance income details on the Override Maintenance Income (MNOI) screen 277-51130020
Examples of amending maintenance income
This table has examples of amending maintenance income details. Note: the dates and figures used are example details only.
Item |
Example |
1 |
Private collection - incorrect or omitted Child Support assessment amounts Susan has an annual child support entitlement of $5,000 since 1 September (new customer with relevant period 1 September to 30 June). Child Support advises a new assessment of $10,000 from 1 January which is later found to be incorrect. Reconciliation calculation was ($5,000 x 122 / 365) + ($10,000 x 181 /365) = $6,630.14 which is annualised $6,630.14 x 365 / (122 + 181) = $7,986.80. As the $10,000 assessment did not apply to Susan, from 1 January to 30 June, Susan collected ($5,000 x 181/ 365) = $2,479.45. Maintenance income details are amended for period 1 January - 30 June, a new amount of $2,479.45. This triggers re-reconciliation - ($5,000 x 122 / 365) + $2,479.45 = $4,150.68 which is annualised: $4,150.68 x 365 / 303 = $5,000 |
2 |
Private collection - customer collects less than full entitlement from 1 July 2012 Esther's child support entitlement for the 2012-13 financial year is $5,000. Esther is not eligible for an exemption. On 1 July 2013, Esther advises that only $4,000 was able to be collected for the financial year. As Esther has not collected the full entitlement as of 1 July 2012, the family assistance will not be restricted to the base rate of FTB Part A due to failing the Maintenance Action Test (MAT). Esther is deemed to have received the full child support entitlement $5,000) for Maintenance Income Test (MIT) purposes. |
3 |
Child Support collection - non-agency payment received as several separate payments across financial years Child Support advise a lump sum non-agency payment of $7,000 for Ross with a date of 4 April 2003. Child Support verify that it is a prescribed payment for school fees. The customer advises $4,000 was paid to the school by their separated partner on 1 March and expects the remainder will be paid in the next financial year. The maintenance income is amended on MNOI using a start and end date of 4 April, with a new amount of $4,000. Ross should advise if and when any more payments are made. |
4 |
Child Support collection - disbursement includes amount for child aged over 18 Julie received a Child Support disbursement of $6,000 on 1 August which Child Support confirms is arrears for two children, Emily aged under 16 and Kerrie who turned 18 on 1 April. As Emily is the only child in the Child Support case, the system assumes the total payment is for Emily, whereas half the payment should be ignored. The maintenance income is amended on MNOI with a start and end date of 1 August with a new amount of $3,000. |
5 |
Private collection - exemption backdated before 1 July of the current financial year Belinda's child support entitlement for the 2014-15 financial year was $3,000 which Belinda elected to collect privately. Belinda is granted a partial violence exemption by a social worker in November 2015. The social worker determines that the exemption should be backdated to 1 July of the previous financial year (1 July 2014). Belinda advised that only $500 was collected of the full Child Support assessed amount during the 2014-15 financial year. Only the amount that was actually collected should be taken into account for the purposes of the Maintenance Income Test (MIT). The maintenance income for the 2014-15 financial year is adjusted to reflect the actual amount of child support received ($500) and Belinda's FTB is re-reconciled resulting in a top-up payment. |
6 |
Child Support collect and customer has a retrospective decrease in the child support assessment, resulting in a child support debt Wendy has a Child Support collect case and collects $4,000 in the 2016-17 financial year. Her FTB for the 2016-17 financial year is reconciled based on the $4,000 she actually collected. Wendy’s ex-husband then lodges his tax return, and the child support assessment for the 2016-17 financial year is retrospectively decreased by $1,500, meaning Wendy has been overpaid $2,500. This becomes a child support debt. Wendy chooses for the child support debt to be recovered via the:
|