Quality Contact Framework quality checking 111-22010000
This document outlines how to conduct quality checks across the agency, as outlined in the Quality Contact Framework.
Select the relevant option:
Verint set up and evaluation
For quality checkers in business teams that have transitioned to Verint.
Verint set up for new and re-accredited Quality Checkers
|
Step |
Action |
|
1 |
Before starting an evaluation + Read more ... Quality checkers must set the default evaluation form for their business team:
Customise the Interaction Search Results view to check if a call has been evaluated under the Quality Contact Framework:
Customise the view
This will make sure that if a quality checker has failed to 'remark' an interaction, it will display the number of evaluations completed. |
Verint evaluation
|
Step |
Action |
|
1 |
Select interaction and evaluation form + Read more ... Identify the staff member:
Note: evaluations for each settlement period must be submitted in Verint by the 2nd business day of the following settlement period. If using manual forms:
How is the interaction to be evaluated?
|
|
2 |
Using Verint + Read more ... Go to the Interactions menu option and select search. Locate the staff member and interaction to evaluate. Select the start time hyperlink to expand the interaction and display the evaluation form. For help with locating and listening to interactions, see Service Delivery Quality and Evaluation > Quality Contact Framework site. |
|
3 |
Using any other method (not Verint) + Read more ... Go to the Interactions menu option and select Evaluate. Select the staff member to evaluate. Amend the start and end date and time to the date and time the interaction was evaluated. Select Go to display the evaluation form. |
|
4 |
Evaluate interaction + Read more ... Evaluate the interaction against each Quality Contact Standard and respond to each question. For more information about each standard, refer to Quality Contact Standards. All questions in the evaluation form must be answered.
If answering No to the privacy and secrecy question, check what action to take. See the Privacy and Secrecy intranet page 'Report a privacy incident' tile. |
|
5 |
Evaluate interaction - interrupting an interaction, authentication and POI + Read more ... Interrupting an interaction This is appropriate in limited cases when:
Authentication Access to this information is the same for all methods of listening. For all recorded interactions, the authentication level displays in the search results in Verint. Authentication and FslverEnrolmentStatus fields in Verint match up with the authentication colours on Services Australia Workspace for the staff member:
Service Officers must follow the relevant process for authentication found in:
Where the correct authentication processes have not been followed, quality checkers must submit a Privacy Incident Notification (PIN) if there is a risk that a Service Officer is speaking to someone other than:
This includes where the Service Officer:
Proof of identity (POI) For call recording, a staff member can update the POI field at any stage during the call. When evaluating if POI requirements are met, check if the call originated from a transfer before considering the POI field. Does the POI field in Verint match up with the details on Services Australia Workspace for the staff member receiving the transfer?
|
|
6 |
Staff safety + Read more ... When undertaking quality checking of interactions, if customer aggression or counterproductive behaviour is identified it may be appropriate to check in with staff to ensure:
Incident identified by:
If the quality checker is affected by an incident of customer aggression during the evaluation:
|
|
7 |
Evaluation feedback + Read more ... Give effective feedback to the staff member on the interaction:
See the Resources page for a presentation on giving feedback. Do not include personal information in free text fields. This is information about a person that meets the definition of 'personal information' in the Privacy Act. Examples include names, dates of birth, addresses or any information that could be used to identify a person. Complete the evaluation feedback field with free text that complies with the Quality Checking Feedback Policy. |
|
8 |
Complete the evaluation + Read more ... Submit the evaluation
Flagging the evaluation is mandatory and is to be completed at the time of the evaluation being recorded.
Remark the interaction
Procedure ends here. |
Calibration and Aim for Accuracy
Calibration and Aim for Accuracy
|
Step |
Action |
|
1 |
Select the relevant exercise + Read more ... For:
|
|
2 |
Calibration + Read more ... In Verint, select the calibration interaction and calibration form relevant to the business area. To check this information, select 'Aim for Accuracy and Calibration' in the Quality Contact Framework SharePoint - Aim for Accuracy and Calibration. |
|
3 |
Aim for Accuracy + Read more ... Aim for Accuracy can be undertaken by business areas at any time. Business areas must contact the Quality Contact Framework (QCF) team to:
|
|
4 |
Evaluate interaction + Read more ... Evaluate the interaction against each element and respond to each question. Answer all questions in each tab on the online evaluation form:
For help with the privacy and secrecy element, see the Resources page. Answering Yes will indicate that the element has been met. There are criteria to the right of the element on the online form to help with decisions. Answering No will indicate that the element has not been met. Select the criterion that has not been met. Give an answer for all criteria. In an Aim for Accuracy check, quality checkers will also answer questions to record if the original check and original feedback is correct. |
|
5 |
Giving feedback + Read more ... Give effective feedback on the interaction checked:
See the Resources page for a presentation on giving feedback. Calibration
Aim for Accuracy
Do not include personal information in free text fields. This is information about a person that meets the definition of 'personal information' in the Privacy Act. Examples include names, dates of birth, addresses or any information that could be used to identify a person. |
|
6 |
Submit evaluation tab + Read more ... Submit after each check. The Aim for Accuracy check will send an email to the original quality checker. The email contains a summary of the element results and the feedback entered on the Evaluation Feedback tab. |
Disputing an evaluation
Dispute process
|
Item |
Description |
|
1 |
Dispute process + Read more ... Staff may dispute the outcome of a quality check if they think it is incorrect or inappropriate. When a staff member disagrees with the evaluation outcome, they should discuss it with their immediate supervisor. Supervisors will then follow the escalation process in line with the business team's dispute management process. Amendments to evaluations may be considered by contacting the Service Delivery Quality and Evaluation team. |