Skip to navigation Skip to content

Assessing a serious failure for refusing to accept or failing to commence a suitable job 001-10100010



This document explains the process undertaken by Participation Solutions Team (PST)-skilled staff who are responsible for deciding serious failures when a Community Development Program (CDP) participant refuses to accept or fails to commence a suitable job.

Serious failure for refusing to accept or failing to commence a suitable job

A serious failure may require investigation when a CDP participant refuses to accept or fails to commence a suitable job.

These may be triggered when:

  • a Participation Report is received from a CDP provider, or
  • information received directly from the CDP participant indicates their refusal to accept or failure to commence a suitable job. In these cases Services Australia staff will generate the serious failure for investigation

Serious failure conditions

A serious failure has only occurred because of a CDP participant refusing to accept or failing to commence a suitable job if:

  • the CDP participant was receiving a payment subjected to mutual obligation requirements on the failure incident date, and
  • the position offered was suitable work based on the CDP participant's individual circumstances, and
  • the CDP participant did not have a reasonable excuse for refusing to accept the offer or commence work as planned

Responsibilities of PST-skilled Staff with WNPPD security resource

PST-skilled staff with WNPPD security resource are responsible for:

  • reviewing existing information on the CDP participant's record which may be relevant to the failure. This includes reviewing the Participation Report and provider comments
  • determining the validity of the failure
  • establishing contact with the CDP participant to:
    • discuss the failure, and
    • record the CDP participant's explanation for the failure
  • contacting third parties such as Employment Services Providers or employers, to gather further information about:
    • the position offered
    • how the offer was made, and/or
    • the refusal to accept or commence suitable employment
  • determining whether personal factors or barriers impacted on the suitability of the employment or the CDP participant's capacity to accept the job offer. This may include consultation with a Centrelink specialist or Indigenous Cultural Consultant
  • recording all elements of the investigation in the Compliance Investigation workflow
  • determining whether a serious failure has occurred and notifying the CDP participant of this determination
    Note: when PST-skilled staff (WNPPD) are not at the APS5 level, consultation with a Service Officer (SO5) must occur before a decision is made to apply a serious failure for refusing or failing to commence a suitable job
  • explaining the serious failure penalty and offering the CDP participant the opportunity to waive the serious failure penalty by attending a waiver re-engagement appointment
  • re-engaging CDP participants who agree to attend a waiver re-engagement appointment with their provider
  • determining if hardship provisions apply when the CDP participant does not have capacity to attend a waiver re-engagement appointment

The Resources page contains a table outlining the different types of serious failures relating to failing or refusing to accept a suitable job offer.

Refusing or failing to accept a suitable job offer

Reviewing and validating Community Development Program (CDP) Provider Reports

Job seeker contacts to discuss non-compliance or circumstances impacting compliance

Suitable/unsuitable work

Assessing reasonable excuse for non-compliance with mutual obligation requirements

Gathering and assessing evidence for a job seeker compliance investigation

Rejecting a compliance action

Re-engaging to a Community Development Program (CDP) provider

Serious failure penalties

Job Seeker Compliance Framework waiver and hardship provisions

Waiving a serious failure period

Serious failure hardship provisions

Effect of a compliance action on Income Management

Manually adjusting non-payment period start and end dates

Determining failure hierarchy when there are multiple failures