Non-compliance with compulsory requirements - review and appeals 001-10130000
This document outlines the review process that applies to Targeted Compliance Framework and Job Seeker Compliance Framework decisions.
Note: where 'job seeker' or 'Employment Service Provider' is referenced in sections applying to both the Targeted Compliance Framework and the Job Seeker Compliance Framework, this includes Community Development Program (CDP) participants and CDP providers.
On this page:
Job seeker contacts about a job seeker compliance decision or suspension
Mutual obligation failure penalty applied without an investigation
Job seeker contacts about a job seeker compliance decision or suspension
Table 1
Item |
Description |
1 |
Determining who made the job seeker compliance decision when a job seeker contacts + Read more ... To make sure the job seeker can be referred to the appropriate Service Officer/Team or Organisation, Service Officers must identify who made the decision. Decisions made by the provider Job seekers who contact about a decision made by a provider or triggered by the Employment Services System (ESS), should be referred to their provider in the first instance. This includes decisions relating to a demerit accrual or the job seeker's Targeted Compliance Framework zone. If the job seeker is not satisfied after discussing the decision with their provider, the job seeker should be referred to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) National Customer Service Line. Decisions made by Services Australia Job seekers who contact about a Targeted Compliance Framework or Job Seeker Compliance Framework decision made by Services Australia should be referred to the Participation Solutions Team (PST) to discuss the decision. To identify compliance action decisions made by Services Australia, review the Participation Compliance Hub within Process Direct. To view:
PST-skilled staff are responsible for discussing:
For further information on job seeker compliance system decisions, see: |
2 |
Job seeker contacts about a job seeker compliance decision made by Services Australia + Read more ... Refer the job seeker to the PST using the appropriate method:
Note: all internal transfers to the PST should be conducted via unannounced (cold) transfer. |
3 |
Job seeker has contacted PST + Read more ... All PST-skilled staff: Discuss the decision with the job seeker and answer any questions using the information recorded in the workflow: In Process Direct:
Further action required is based on the security resource of the PST-skilled Service Officer. PST-skilled staff (PFDEC):
PST-skilled staff (WNPPD):
Important:
|
4 |
Decision maker (DM) + Read more ... If the PST-skilled Service Officer is speaking with the job seeker as the Decision Maker (DM), and the job seeker is not satisfied with the decision, transfer them to the PST Virtual Support Queue (VSQ) via a warm hand-off to discuss with a PST-skilled Service Officer (WNPPD). If the job seeker is unable to be transferred to PST VSQ immediately, give the job seeker their internal review options after the decision has been made. |
5 |
PST-skilled staff (WNPPD) + Read more ... To identify the investigation details for the decision the job seeker would like to discuss: In Process Direct:
Discuss the decision with the job seeker and answer any questions. If an error is identified that would change the penalty outcome if corrected:
If no error is identified, give the job seeker their internal review options. |
6 |
Request for explanation work item allocated + Read more ... A request for explanation work item ZIAM_EIR_PST_EXP, can only be completed by PST-skilled staff (WNPPD) as a PST Subject Matter Expert (SME). To action this work item, see SME explanations, ARO referrals and implementing ARO decisions. Note: PST SMEs can undertake a reassessment of the investigation decision, including revoking an applied failure as a result of further information or an error in the original decision. |
Mutual obligation failure penalty applied without an investigation
Table 2
Item |
Description |
1 |
Action required when a mutual obligation failure penalty was applied without a compliance investigation + Read more ... A financial penalty with a status of Applied - job seeker declined investigation (AAP), is a financial penalty that has been applied without an investigation. This status does not preclude the job seeker from providing information or having the decision reassessed. Before internal review options can be provided, job seekers who have an AAP status penalty must have an investigation completed by a PST-skilled staff (WNPPD). If a job seeker contacts about an accepted mutual obligation failure penalty that has not been investigated, PST-skilled staff (WNPPD) should take the following action within Process Direct:
If the job seeker is not satisfied with the decision, transfer the job seeker to the PST Virtual Support Queue (VSQ) via a warm hand-off for a further discussion. If the job seeker is unable to be transferred to PST VSQ immediately, give the job seeker their internal review options. |
2 |
Adjustment to financial penalties as a result of a mutual obligation failure + Read more ... When a decision to apply a penalty for a failure is varied, this may impact the penalty applied for other failures within the failure group. The job seeker's financial penalties for any subsequent penalties in the group will be adjusted automatically by the system. |