Finalising a change of assessment (COA) application 277-03120040
This document outlines the processes and administrative tasks Internal Decision Makers (IDM) and Contracted Decision Makers (CDM) must follow when an agreement is received during a change of assessment (COA) application and when finalising a COA.
On this page:
Child Support agreements received during the COA process
Decision Maker (DM) tasks prior to finalising a COA application
Decision Maker (DM) to finalise the COA decision
Record and process the Notice of Decision (NTD)
Child Support agreements received during the COA process
Table 1: This table describes the process for Decision Makers (DM) to follow when a Child Support agreement is received during the COA process.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Agreement received during COA process + Read more ... When an agreement is received by the Agreements Team during the COA process, the Agreements Service Officer notifies the relevant DM by pending the registration, initiating phone contact and routing an Agreement in Progress intray to the DM. Note: if an agreement is received without a pended registration, refer the agreement to the Agreements Team to be recorded, see Customer referral guidelines for Child Support staff. For Capacity To Pay (CTP) customers, only consider an agreement made after a section 98M letter has been issued. If an agreement is made before a section 98M letter is issued, action the agreement in accordance with Agreements between Child Support customers. Check if the customer's case is based on a provisional notional assessment (PNA). If so, immediately record a modification to prevent a notional assessment from issuing. This will also prevent adverse outcomes for Family Tax Benefit (FTB) customers until the COA has been finalised. Check the date the agreement was made (the date it was last signed by a customer). If the agreement was made:
|
2 |
Agreement made before or at the same time a COA application is lodged + Read more ... When an agreement for child support is made before or at the same time a COA application is lodged, refer the agreement to the Agreements team to make a decision on whether the agreement should be accepted or refused in accordance with Agreements between Child Support customers. The Agreements team will notify DM if the application for acceptance of the agreement is likely to be accepted or refused. If the agreement is likely to be refused the COA decision making process will continue as normal. If the agreement is likely to be accepted:
|
3 |
Agreement made after a COA application is lodged + Read more ... Review the agreement to determine if the agreement is binding or limited.
Note: if you accept a child support agreement during the COA process, the initial COA application is taken to be an application for COA to vary the PNA that will generate when the Agreement is loaded onto Cuba. If the agreement cannot be implemented, consider whether another agreement can be made. |
4 |
Contact customer to discuss likely outcome of agreement decision + Read more ...
Agreements made before or at the same time the COA was lodged The Agreements team is required to accept valid child support agreements that are made before or at the same time a COA application is lodged, unless the customer who applied for acceptance of the agreement withdraws their agreement application. Contact the customer who lodged the agreement to determine if they would prefer the agreement be considered through the COA process, see Contact with Child Support customers.
Agreements made after the COA was lodged Contact the customer who lodged the agreement to discuss its implications in relation to their future notional assessment. Do not encourage customers to withdraw their COA application if an agreement is accepted during the COA process. Explain:
Document the discussion, outcomes and actions in the Customer Contact tab, see Documenting Child Support information. |
5 |
Finalise decision to accept or reject the agreement + Read more ... For agreements made and received while a COA application is in progress, prepare a Notice of Decision (NTD) in relation to the PNA that generates when the agreement is recorded in Cuba. Finalise the decision to accept or reject the agreement. Use the Agreement submission and decision macro to document the reasons for the decision in the Case window. Add a pointer record in a COA Maintenance notepad. Is the agreement accepted?
|
6 |
Writing and processing the Notice of Decision (NTD) + Read more ... When writing the NTD in relation to the varied PNA, consider any other period of assessment not covered by the terms of the agreement that a customer has requested be considered such as:
Where the NTD applies to the whole agreement period, process the modification through the Notional Assessment Modification window. Also check:
|
7 |
Agreements team to process acceptance or rejection of agreement + Read more ... DMs document the decision regarding the agreement so the Agreements Service Officer can finalise it as accepted or refused on Cuba. Create and route a COA General Follow Up intray to an Agreements Service Officer with relevant notepad instructions. The Agreements Team process the decision to accept or reject the agreement in Cuba by recording modifications to the notional assessment.
|
Decision Maker (DM) tasks prior to finalising a COA application
Table 2: This table describes the general considerations and customer contact to be undertaken by the Decision Maker (DM) to ensure the decision is just and equitable and otherwise proper before finalising a COA application.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Duration of the COA decision + Read more ... When determining the duration of the COA decision consider:
Consider longer term decisions when the customers' circumstances are relatively stable. DMs should also seek to make longer term decisions with a high level of flexibility, for example, setting an adjusted taxable income amount. By setting an adjusted taxable income amount for either customer, simple administrative changes to the assessment, during the period of the COA decision, may be possible such as a change in levels of care. |
2 |
Future changes + Read more ... Consider possible future events that may impact on the customers, but cannot affect the assessment while the COA decision is in place such as:
Where possible, ensure COA decisions allow for future changes in circumstances to be reflected without requiring customers to make further COA applications. Consider the effect a longer term decision will have on the customers' options for simple amendments to the assessment. It may be appropriate to make a shorter decision if it is likely that future events cannot be taken into account when a COA variation is in place. |
3 |
Relationship of the customers + Read more ... Consider the attitude and behaviour of the customers. If a customer has demonstrated an intention to undermine the assessment, it may be appropriate to consider a longer term decision. For example, evidence of persistent abuse of the estimate provisions may support applying a long term income amount order to the case. Consider whether:
If the customers have an amicable relationship, consider whether they can be encouraged to pursue other administrative options such as making an agreement. |
4 |
Remaining life of the case and the age of the child(ren) + Read more ... Consider:
|
5 |
Refuse the COA application + Read more ... Consider refusing the COA application if:
See References for a link to the Child Support Guide 2.6.3, A decision to refuse to change an assessment. |
6 |
Further evidence + Read more ...
DMs are to make 3 attempts at different times of the day to phone the other party for their comments. If unsuccessful, refer to the unsuccessful attempts in the NTD, see Contact with Child Support customers. If evidence or information is not received by the agreed timeframe, see Step 1 in the Finalise the decision table. Evidence or information can include:
If new information or evidence is received prior to the NTD being written and finalised:
Give customers the opportunity to validate or correct any document/information suspected of being falsified or that includes incorrect information. If the new information is:
This ensures both parties have an opportunity to respond or comment on matters that may adversely affect them. Record the COA customer contact (including attempts to contact customers) in the COA Maintenance window. Note: ‘Suspicious Matter Reports’ (SMRs) from AUSTRAC must never be disclosed. This means they must not be included when making a submission – they cannot be disclosed to any court or tribunal and are not admissible as evidence. You must review AUSTRAC search results to ensure they do not contain an SMR/SUSTR – these must not be recorded in the system. If a record needs to be removed, take immediate action by sending an email to the National Intensive Collection Services team. Full details regarding AUSTRAC disclosure of information can be found as an attachment on the Resources page. |
7 |
Pre-decision contact with customers to discuss likely outcome + Read more ...
Ask both parties if they require a post decision call. If so, create a COA Call Back Required intray with a notepad detailing the request. Record the COA customer contact. Also check if the customer:
|
Decision Maker (DM) to finalise the COA decision
Table 3: This table describes the process for Decision Makers (DM) to follow in finalising the COA decision.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Consider COA decision + Read more ... Consider whether:
Before writing the reasons for decision, see References for a link to the Child Support Guide 2.6.4, Kinds of change of assessment decisions. Note: in Registrar Initiated Change of Assessment cases customers are able to make a joint election to discontinue the proceedings. However, this only applies if the carer entitled to child support does not receive an income tested pension, benefit or allowance. See References for a link to the Child Support Guide 2.6.6, Registrar-initiated change of assessment or Capacity to pay (CTP) Child Support. |
2 |
Refusals + Read more ... An application may be refused for a variety of reasons. Too complex - Section 98E A COA application can be refused where the case or issues raised are too complex. Decisions to refuse the COA application due to being too complex, requires the approval of an EL1 DM Team Leader. The EL1 DM Team Leader must document their confirmation on the COA Maintenance notepad before the decision is processed.
An applicant can object to the section 98E refusal decision ('too complex' finding). Prior to 1 July 2015 if the objection was disallowed, the customer could apply straight to court for a departure from their assessment. From 1 July 2015, a person may apply to the AAT for a first review of the decision where the matter has been determined by Objections as being too complex. No reason exists or it is not ‘just and equitable’ and ‘otherwise proper’ - Section 98F and 98L A COA application can be refused if the customer or DM has not established a reason to change the assessment or it would not be just and equitable and otherwise proper to change the assessment.
Examples include:
References has links to the Child Support Guide 2.6.2, What are the reasons for a change of assessment? and Child Support Guide 2.6.17, Would a change be just and equitable? Previous refusal and no new matter raised – subsection 98J(2) A COA application can be refused if the customer has not raised any new matter in a subsequent application that distinguishes it from a previous application that was refused. CTP recommendations – subsections 98L(1) and 98R A CTP recommendation can be refused if:
Under subsection 98R, refuse to make a change to the child support assessment because the issues are too complex. Consider all the relevant information provided by the customers and the information available. |
3 |
Write Notice of Decision + Read more ... Use the Change of Assessment (COA) NTD template macro to write the Notice of Decision (NTD). DM decisions that change the assessment must include:
For information on the financial capacity of business owners, see Calculating financial capacity for business owners. The decision must not:
A detailed NTD assists the customer to fully understand the COA decision. In the event the customer wishes to exercise their right to object to the decision, a well-documented decision enables a customer to identify any elements they disagree with whether that is a fact relied on or a perceived error in applying the law or policy. Clear and concise decisions also reduce the number of post decision disputes. Note: do not run eligibility or load onto Cuba until the written decision has been peer reviewed. |
4 |
Process the Notice of Decision + Read more ... For COA applications that have been refused, Cuba will generate a 'Refusal decision made and NTD attached' (COA9-1) letter to both customers. Discard the letter and:
Also check if the customer:
Decisions to refuse the COA application due to being too complex, require the approval of an EL1 DM Team Leader. The EL1 DM Team Leader must document their confirmation on the COA Maintenance notepad before the decision is processed. See the Record the decision table to process the COA decision and finalise the COA application in Cuba, also see the Change of Assessment Cuba process help. Exceptions: If non-parent carers are a party to the assessment, see the Record the decision table. If the case is an international case and there is a change to the liability, a notice of this change must be sent to the relevant Overseas Authority:
If, based on discussions with the customers, it is anticipated that a customer will be dissatisfied or complain about the decision, see Step 12 in Record the decision table. |
5 |
Customer contact to inform COA decision finalised + Read more ... Check that either customer is not in 1 of the following categories:
If so, contact the customers and advise them of the outcome and that a NTD has been sent to all parties. See Contact with Child Support customers. Streamlined contact for prescribed customers Contact prescribed customers to inform them of the COA decision and advise that a NTD has been issued to all parties. See Contact with Child Support customers. A prescribed customer:
And all of the following apply:
Customer is managed by Personalised Services
Customer does not fall in to any of the above categories If the decision is contrary:
For all other outcomes:
DMs use the NTD to:
Note: a DM is not required to send a separate ‘Please Contact’ letter if attempts to contact the customer(s) fail. |
6 |
Multiple cases and administrative issues + Read more ... Where a customer has multiple cases:
Where administrative issues are identified:
For a COA Reason 2:
|
Record and process the Notice of Decision (NTD)
Table 4: This table describes the process for Internal Decision Makers (IDMs), Contracted Decision Makers (CDMs) and Contract Decision Maker (CDM) Support Officers to follow when recording and processing a Notice of Decision (NTD) in Cuba.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Record Notice of Decision (NTD) + Read more ... NTDs for the Change of Assessment (COA) application are made and written by IDMs and CDMs in a standardised format, see COA NTD template. IDMs are responsible for:
The CDM Support team is responsible for:
CDM Support Officers, go to Step 2. IDMs, go to Step 3. |
2 |
Read the decision section of the NTD + Read more ... Complete the COA Decision to Be Processed intray within 2 working days to give effect to the decision in Cuba. Read the decision section of the NTD only and check for:
If further clarification is require:
If the NTD increases a customer’s income and there are multiple cases, consider referring the case to CTP, see Capacity to pay (CTP) Child Support. |
3 |
Process the Notice of Decision + Read more ... If there is no variation to the assessment, finalise the COA application in the Finalisation window. The system generated letters (COA8-1) are discarded and replaced with the MX0-1 letter, advising both parties that a COA decision has been made. Document that the system generated letters have been discarded. If there is a variation to the assessment:
Also check if the customer:
If there is a reverse case, go to Step 4. If non-parent carers are a party to the assessment, go to Step 5. All other instances, go to Step 6. |
4 |
Reverse cases + Read more ... If the COA decision causes a reverse case to generate, see Managing reverse child support cases to ensure that the accuracy of the reverse case, particularly in relation to collection, has been verified. If there is already an existing reverse case, a formula modification must be applied to that case, see Reverse cases Cuba Process Help. If the NTD:
Ensure the formula modification is applied to the correct customer. If non-parent carers are a party to the assessment, go to Step 5. All other instances, go to Step 6. |
5 |
Non-parent carers + Read more ... To process non-parent carers:
When processing the NTD, the covering letters generated print locally and only refer to 1 party to the application and actually need to refer to 2 other parties. To remedy this:
When a customer’s role on a case is shown as ‘Other Liable Parent’, process any formula modification relating to them as ‘payee’ even though the non-parent carer is shown as ‘payee’. To set a paying customer's income in both assessments where a non-parent carer is a party to the assessment, different formula modifications are required for the paying customers. For example:
|
6 |
Cases with multiple children - assessments ended prior to COA application lodgement + Read more ... A COA decision is not applicable to the children whose assessment ended on or prior to the date the COA application was lodged. If a decision applies to a past period and 1 or more of the children's assessment ended during that past period:
The option to remove the children from the COA registration is only available to Senior Support Officers (SSO) with CUB access:
Once completed:
|
7 |
Save eligibility + Read more ... Before saving eligibility, CDM Support Officers must check the COA Maintenance window or intray notepad for any amendments to the decision requested by the CDM. Save eligibility to automatically generate new assessment letters (GNV) to both customers, explaining why their child support assessment has been changed:
|
8 |
Error identified in finalised NTD + Read more ... If an error is identified in a finalised NTD, the objections process is usually the appropriate option for customers, even where the DM agrees the NTD contains an error and needs to be corrected, especially if new evidence is submitted or matters are to be reconsidered See the References page for links to the Child Support Guide 4.1: Objections and Objections to Child Support Decisions. Simple typographical errors that do not alter the outcome of the final decision can be corrected by a DM. Examples of such typographical errors include:
An amended notice must indicate that it was reissued with corrections on a particular date. Do not alter the date of the decision. The amended notice is not a new decision, and does not result in new objection rights. The amended NTD must:
|
9 |
Review and alter of decisions + Read more ... In some situations a finalised NTD can be corrected by using the Registrar’s power to review and alter decisions of delegates. In all such cases however, the original DM cannot amend the NTD, see Correcting errors on Child Support cases. Use the review and alter powers to only correct an obvious error or mistake in a decision. In all other circumstances, an objection is usually the best option. Examples of errors which can be corrected using the Registrar’s review and alter powers:
An example of when not to use the review and alter powers is:
When an error can be corrected using the Registrar’s review and alter powers, the DM must:
If there is no new evidence or new circumstances, the DM can make a recommendation to change the decision and that this change would be just, equitable and otherwise proper using the correcting errors submission macro. The DM should:
Note: the DM must not advise the customers that the NTD will be amended, or issue the amended NTD to the customers until approval is received from Program Advice. See Correcting errors on Child Support cases. If an error is corrected using the Registrar’s review and alter powers, the customers’ objection rights start from when they receive the amended NTD. Once an error is corrected, issue and process an amended NTD in the Finalisation window. If a decision is flawed to the extent that it is unreasonable for the customer to proceed to objection or court it is likely that the decision is invalid. For example, the wrong law was applied or there was a denial of procedural fairness or a material piece of evidence was overlooked. Refer to Correcting errors on Child Support cases for more information regarding invalid decisions. |
10 |
Process an amended NTD (IDM/CDM Support Officer) + Read more ... An amended NTD must:
If the amended NTD alters the decision, process the updated decision in Cuba in the Amendment group box in the Finalisation window. Also check if the customer:
|
11 |
Unlocking customers and outstanding issues + Read more ... Customers can be unlocked when:
If the COA application has been finalised and there are no outstanding issues to follow up, unlock the customers and:
If the customers are case managed by another area, inform the case manager of the outcome via a notepad in a General Follow Up intray with the date set for 2 days’ time. If there are outstanding issues that require follow-up, create the appropriate intray or a COA General Follow Up intray detailing the action required. Refer specialised activities to the owning business area. See Customer referral guidelines for Child Support staff. Common activity intrays can be routed to:
Note: CDM Support Officers are required to lock customers and resolve outstanding issues in line with Customer Management Approach (CMA) process. If customer wishes to lodge a complaint or a privacy incident has occurred, go to Step 12. Otherwise, procedure ends here. |
12 |
Customer complaints and privacy incidents + Read more ... If a customer is dissatisfied with the COA decision or service provided after receiving the NTD, DMs are to assist in resolving the issues raised by the customer. If the issues cannot be resolved with the DM, customers have the option of:
If the customer wishes to pursue either of these options, transfer them to the relevant business area, see Customer referral guidelines for Child Support staff. Ensure the customer understands that disclosure of all relevant facts disclosed in the NTD does not constitute a privacy breach. Immediately inform the IDM Team Leader or CDM Contract Manager if the customer indicates they are concerned their privacy has been breached by disclosure of:
See Privacy incidents for more information. Multiple cases If a customer has multiple cases and the COA decision has increased their adjusted taxable income, consider whether a capacity to pay referral should be made to ensure fairness and equity for the child support payable in all of their active cases. Refer to the capacity to pay referral guidelines for further information. |