Complex system processing for reverse child support cases 277-03020020
For Service Support Officers (SSO) and Program Support Managers (PSM).
This page contains information about the system processing requirements for reverse child support cases.
On this page:
System processing steps of SSOs and PSMs
Cuba processing for reverse cases where income discrepancies exist
Cuba processing for reverse cases where mixed assessments exist
Cuba processing for reverse non-parent carer cases
Cuba processing for reverse cases impacted by other events
System processing steps of SSOs and PSMs
Table 1: this table describes the process SSOs and PSMs follow to resolve complex system processing for reverse child support cases.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Complex reverse case factors that may impact assessment accuracy + Read more ... When a role reversal occurs there are a number of factors that can impact the assessment accuracy. Most reverse case processing discrepancies can be resolved by Service Officers following the process in Managing reverse child support cases. For more complex reverse case system issues, Service Officers must refer to their SSO to investigate. Complex reverse case system issues include:
|
Cuba processing for reverse cases where income discrepancies exist
Table 2: this table describes the process followed by SSOs and PSMs where reverse case income discrepancies exist.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Amended taxable income incorrectly applied + Read more ... As of 23 May 2018, a parent’s amended taxable income will be used in most circumstances, see Australian Taxation Office (ATO) income for Child Support customers. The SSO:
|
2 |
Apply estimate to reverse case (from 2 July 2010) + Read more ... When a parent lodges an estimate of income it should be applied to all active cases the customer is party to (regardless of role). However, this does not occur in all instances. If a reverse case generates automatically the estimate of income is not automatically applied to this reverse case. Manual processing is required to apply the estimate to the reverse case.
Otherwise, the SSO:
|
3 |
Apply estimate to reverse case (1 July 2008 to 1 July 2010) + Read more ... When a customer lodged an estimate of income between 1 July 2008 and 1 July 2010 Cuba did not automatically apply the estimate to all cases and it was possible to select the estimate to apply to only 1 case. During that period, Cuba prompted the Service Officer to select all cases with the same child support period start date, however this was not a mandatory action and some cases did not have the estimate applied appropriately. After the processes in Correcting errors on Child Support cases have been completed (as real time processing will never apply to these cases), manual processing is required to correct the error. The SSO:
|
4 |
Estimates when child support period not aligned (1 July 2008 to 1 July 2010) + Read more ... A new child support period does not commence just because a parent’s role changes and a reverse case is generated. The child support period start date used in the reverse case is the same as the date used in the existing case, however Cuba does not always apply the original child support period and instead commences a new 1 using the date the roles reversed. In this instance, a customer may have estimated their income for a child support period that was incorrect. When the child support period is aligned the estimate is revoked. This issue only involves estimates that apply from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2010. As aligning the child support periods revokes the estimate the customer must apply through the courts to have this changed. The customer cannot apply through the Change of Assessment process as this period is greater than 18 months. The References page contains a link to the Child Support Guide 4.3.2: Applications and orders about decisions under the Assessment Act. Note: do not apply system processing to correct this assessment. |
5 |
Check letters are correct + Read more ... Duplicate letters may issue to customers who have a reverse case where the customer is recorded as the payee in 1 case and the payer in the other, for example when the customer lodges an estimate of income a letter will issue for each case, even though they are assessed to either pay child support as the ‘overall payer’ or receive child support as the ‘overall payee’. In some instances, such as when a customer’s Post Separation Income (PSI) is accepted, a letter issues from both cases but without a case number specified. After processing changes to reverse cases check that all letters issuing are appropriate. |
Cuba processing for reverse cases where mixed assessments exist
Table 3: this table describes the process steps followed by SSOs and PSMs to process a reverse case on Cuba for cases where a mixed assessment exists.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Mixed assessments + Read more ... A mixed assessment occurs when child support for some of the children of a case is assessed using the formula and other children are covered by an agreement, court varied assessment (CVA) or change of assessment (COA) decision. This may occur when an agreement, CVA or COA has only ever applied to some of the children or if it stops applying to some of the children because of a change in circumstances. Manual processing is required to ensure the:
|
2 |
Check for an agreement + Read more ... Agreement suspensions and terminations due to care If the assessment is based on an agreement and a care change results in the payee ceasing to be an eligible carer for the child (less than 35% care) for more than 28 days, the agreement will end for that child from the date the payee ceased to be an eligible carer. An agreement suspension period may apply for 28 days (or up to 26 weeks in some circumstances). See Suspending or ending a Child Support agreement due to care. If the agreement continues to apply for another child/ren, manual processing may be required to determine the net annual rate payable via a mixed assessment:
Note: the 1 July 2018 changes for the suspension and ending of agreements due to care only apply to child support cases involving WA ex-nuptial children from 15 May 2019. Agreement role swap clauses If the agreement has a clause that allows the roles of the parties to swap when there is a care change and the clause has been activated, the agreement will not be suspended or terminated if the payee ceases to be an eligible carer. Child support as provided by the agreement will become payable to the other party when the specified level of care applies. See Managing Changes affecting a child support agreement. If there are other children on the agreement not affected by the role swap clause and the overall roles of payer and payee do not change, manual processing will be required to determine the net annual rate payable by offsetting the 2 agreement rates:
If the overall roles of payer and payee do change, a reverse case will need to be created and an agreement registration will need to be entered on the new case. The original case will also need to be modified:
If there are other children on the agreement not affected by the role swap clause, manual processing will also be required on the reverse case to determine the net annual rate payable by offsetting the 2 agreement rates:
Once the appropriate modifications have been keyed, accept the agreement. Delete agreement acceptance letters (REG5-1/2 letters), however the PNA that is created should still be sent to both parents. |
3 |
Shared or divided care cases + Read more ... Manual processing is required when the children of the case are in shared or divided care and 1 party is assessed to pay in accordance with the child support formula; whereas the other party is assessed to pay in accordance with a departure. This is because Cuba does not automatically offset the 2 amounts and instead creates an annual rate in each of the cases. Example: Mike and Fiona have 2 children, John and Travis. Initially both children are in Fiona’s 100% care. Mike is assessed to pay Fiona periodic amounts of $6,000 per child per annum ($12,000 total) in accordance with a change of assessment (COA) decision. A care change occurs resulting in John moving into Mike’s 100% care (Travis remains in Fiona’s 100% care). Mike is assessed to pay Fiona an amount of $6,000 for Travis (as per the COA decision) and Fiona is assessed to pay Mike a formula amount of $4,904 for Travis. The net outcome is Mike pays Fiona the difference of $1,096 ($6,000 COA less $4,904 formula = $1,096). Manual processing is required to determine the net annual rate by offsetting the 2 amounts. The SSO:
The PSM:
|
4 |
Estimate lodged in case where an income amount order does not apply to all children + Read more ... In 1 child support case there may be separate assessments for children, for example the assessment for 1 child may be based on an agreement and the other on the administrative formula. A parent may make an estimate election in the assessment where there is no Income Amount Order (IAO) in place. As Cuba does not recognise that in 1 child support case the assessments for each child are determined independently the estimate cannot be accepted as an IAO is in place, even if it does not apply to all children. The customer must apply for a change of assessment to have their income taken into account in this circumstance. |
5 |
Calculating mixed assessments and Cuba + Read more ... Calculate the mixed assessment by completing a manual calculation, using the Child support formula calculator. If a manual mixed assessment needs to be applied for the first time or an existing mixed assessment needs to be recalculated to a new amount, record the manual calculations in the Formula Modification Window including the following standardised documentation: 'This mixed assessment calculation is based on the current formula and departure amounts. If a new event occurs that would ordinarily vary the formula or departure amounts, for example a new income is received; or a care change occurs, this mixed assessment will need to be recalculated and reapplied via the formula modification window - please contact an SSO'. Add a Special Contact to the Customer windows of both customers. Add a notepad with the subject heading ‘Mixed Asst. Formula Modification’ with the following standardised documentation: ‘This mixed assessment calculation is based on the current formula and departure amounts. If a new event occurs that would ordinarily vary the formula or departure amounts, for example a new income is received; or a care change occurs, this mixed assessment will need to be recalculated and reapplied via the formula modification window - please contact an SSO’. If a retrospective mixed assessment period is to be amended, see Correcting errors on Child Support cases. |
6 |
Check letters are correct + Read more ... Duplicate letters may issue to customers who have a reverse case where the customer is recorded as the payee in 1 case and the payer in the other, for example when the customer lodges an estimate of income a letter will issue for each case, even though they are assessed to either pay child support as the ‘overall payer’ or receive child support as the ‘overall payee’. In some instances, such as when a customer’s Post Separation Income (PSI) is accepted, a letter issues from both cases but without a case number specified. After processing changes to reverse cases check that all letters issuing are appropriate. |
Cuba processing for reverse non-parent carer cases
Table 4: this table describes the Cuba processing requirements for processing reverse non-parent carer cases.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Estimate not applied to all cases + Read more ... When a parent lodges an estimate of income this is used as their income in any calculation that determines the cost of the child. Where the applicant is a non-parent carer the costs of the child are determined using both parents’ incomes. This means the estimate should be used in the cost of child calculations on all cases where there is a non-parent carer. As Cuba does not automatically apply a parent’s estimate to all cases manual processing is required. Example: Jackie and George have 3 children. Zara lives with Jackie, Peter lives with George and Kara lives with Polly. Cuba represents this scenario in at least 3 cases. If George lodges an estimate it must be applied to all cases. Cuba automatically applies the estimate to some cases, however manual processing is required to ensure the estimate is accurately reflected in all cases. The SSO:
|
2 |
Alignment of incomes where both parents are liable to pay a non-parent carer + Read more ... Where an income is updated for a parent who is liable to pay a non-parent carer, Cuba does not always apply that new income to the case where the parent has the role of ‘other liable parent’. This means that the parent is assessed on different incomes within the same legislative case. Complete the processes in Correcting errors on Child Support cases. Once completed, if a decision is made to correct the error, manual processing is required. The SSO:
The PSM:
|
3 |
Children from multiple cases + Read more ... Where a non-parent carer cares for children from more than 1 assessment case Cuba does not reflect the 2 different incomes that should be used in the assessment. In the below example, the father’s income would be the same for both children but as each child has a different mother their assessments need to be based on their own mother’s income. As Cuba shows both children on 1 case instead of 2, manual processing is required. Example Jane has 100% care of 2 children (Billie and Marley). Billie is the child of Craig and Lisa. Marley is the child of Craig and Sammy. Jane applies for Craig and Lisa to be assessed for child support for Billie and Craig and Sammy to be assessed for child support for Marley. Manual processing is required because Cuba reflects the liability of Craig in a single case when Craig should be assessed in 2 separate cases. The SSO:
The PSM:
|
4 |
Multi case allowance/cap incorrectly applied + Read more ... Manual processing is required for cases where the multi case cap or multi case allowance has been incorrectly applied. The SSO:
The PSM:
|
5 |
Children of the case shown as relevant dependent children + Read more ... Cuba may reflect some eligible children in non-parent carer cases as relevant dependent children. Manual processing is required to accurately reflect the eligible children. Example: Ross and Taylor have a case for 2 children. Ross also has a case with Brooke for Corey who is in shared care. Cuba incorrectly applies both a multi-case allowance and dependent allowance for Corey. Ross should only receive the multi-case allowance. The SSO:
The PSM:
Note: if customer contact is required it is completed by the owning Service Officer, see Contact with Child Support customers |
6 |
Formula components incorrectly applied + Read more ... Manual processing is required if Cuba incorrectly applies a component of the formula, for example cost of children or relevant dependent allowance. The SSO:
The PSM:
|
7 |
Check letters are correct + Read more ... Duplicate letters may issue to customers who have a reverse case where the customer is recorded as the payee in 1 case and the payer in the other, for example when the customer lodges an estimate of income a letter will issue for each case, even though they are assessed to either pay child support as the ‘overall payer’ or receive child support as the ‘overall payee’. In some instances, such as when a customer’s Post Separation Income (PSI) is accepted, a letter issues from both cases but without a case number specified. After processing changes to reverse cases check that all letters issuing are appropriate. |
Cuba processing for reverse cases impacted by other events
Table 5: this table describes the steps followed by SSOs and PSMs to process a reverse case on Cuba for cases impacted by particular events.
Step |
Action |
1 |
Child returns to parent’s care and formula departure applies + Read more ... When a child returns to a parent’s care during a period where a CVA or change of assessment applies Cuba does not automatically apply the departure amount and manual processing is required. The SSO refers the case to a PSM. The PSM:
Note: if customer contact is required this is completed by the owning Service Officer, see Contact with Child Support customers |
2 |
Terminating event due to reconciliation + Read more ... Post 1 July 2008, when customers are reconciled for more than 6 months the child support case/s end as this is defined as a terminating event. See Terminating events (Stage 2) (CS). Manual processing is required if there is an agreement, CVA or change of assessment in place. The SSO:
|
3 |
Terminating event due to care advised more than 26 weeks from date of event + Read more ... Where a customer has indicated they would like to reapply for Child Support after a care terminating event (care advised 26 weeks or more after event and all carers cease to be eligible), the case should be restarted from the date the request was made. Online applications, macros and guided processes in Pluto ask customers if they want to apply for a new assessment if their care change causes their assessment to end. The customer’s response to this question will be stored in a notepad. If a customer has asked to reapply for an assessment, the assessment will restart for the date this question was answered. As the child support assessment will be active until eligibility is run following the acceptance of the care change, the child support assessment can be restarted by the owning officer without the need for a referral to New Customers. Follow the process for creating a reverse case with the following exceptions:
|
4 |
Apply post separation income to reverse case + Read more ... A customer can apply to have additional income earned after separation excluded from their adjusted taxable income, referred to as post separation income (PSI). See Post separation income for Child Support customers. Manual processing is required to reflect the PSI in both cases. The SSO:
|
5 |
Both cases ended after payee election to end + Read more ... Where both parents are eligible carers a reverse case will exist. One case may have an annual rate and the other case must have a $0 annual rate. In these circumstances the payee for the overall case is easily identified as they are the parent entitled to receive child support. However, in cases where both annual rates are $0 for example neither parent is assessed to pay child support because both parents are on a low income it is unclear which parent is the payee when determining who is eligible to elect to end the assessment. For details on how elections to end can be made in cases where the liability is $0 see Ending a Child Support Assessment. If a parent elects to end an assessment, this can have Centrelink implications if the other parent (the payer for child support purposes) is in receipt of Family Tax Benefit (FTB) and is still required to take reasonable maintenance action. If there are reverse cases, Centrelink must be advised both cases have ended and which children the election applies to. Centrelink may need to add coding to reflect that the other parent is taking reasonable maintenance action. The SSO:
|
6 |
International + Read more ... For information specific to New Zealand cases, see NZ Reverse Case Processing attachment on the Resources page. |
7 |
Check letters are correct + Read more ... Duplicate letters may issue to customers who have a reverse case where the customer is recorded as the payee in 1 case and the payer in the other, for example when the customer lodges an estimate of income a letter will issue for each case, even though they are assessed to either pay child support as the ‘overall payer’ or receive child support as the ‘overall payee’. In some instances, such as when a customer’s Post Separation Income (PSI) is accepted, a letter issues from both cases but without a case number specified. After processing changes to reverse cases check that all letters issuing are appropriate. |