Job seeker compliance for job seekers affected by a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event 001-10040020
This page contains information to assist Participation Solutions Team (PST) staff in actioning outstanding compliance action or applying hardship provisions for job seekers affected by a natural disaster, declared emergency or significant event or assisting with a recovery effort through a registered organisation.
On this page:
Targeted Compliance Framework action when a formal pause of mutual obligation requirements has been advised
Table 1
Item |
Description |
1 |
Finalise outstanding Mutual Obligation, Work Refusal or Unemployment Failures + Read more ... PST-skilled staff must reject all failures without investigation where mutual obligation requirements were paused for the job seeker's location regardless of the incident date. In Process Direct:
|
2 |
Capability Assessment + Read more ... Generally, the Capability Assessment should be completed at the time of initial contact. Any impacts the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event are likely to have on the job seeker's capacity to meet their current requirements on an ongoing basis should be considered and recorded during the Capability Assessment. When the job seeker is due to report and it is not possible or appropriate to complete the Capability Assessment due to the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, PST staff may ask the job seeker to call back as soon as possible before or on their next reporting day to complete the assessment. In these cases, the job seeker has met the re-engagement requirement to arrange a Capability Assessment once:
Once this has been completed, update the Capability Assessment using Save and Exit reason Unable to complete today to allow:
For the process to Save and Exit a Capability Assessment using the rejection reason Unable to complete today, see Capability Assessments. |
Job Seeker Compliance Framework action when a formal pause of mutual obligation requirements has been advised
Table 2
Item |
Description |
1 |
Finalise outstanding Non-Attendance Reports (NAR) + Read more ... If a Community Development Program (CDP) participant contacts from a region or community where a formal pause of mutual obligations has been advised, and their participation payment is suspended reason SUS-ANR, PST-skilled staff must take the following action to manually finalise the NAR: In Process Direct:
|
2 |
Reject connection, reconnection, non-attendance and No Show, No Pay failures + Read more ... In Process Direct:
|
3 |
End reconnection failure periods + Read more ... When a CDP participant is subject to a further reconnection requirement arising from the submission of a Provider Appointment Report (PAR), the provider is responsible for managing re-engagement requirements. Where a CDP participant is unable to contact their provider due to a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event and has a reconnection failure period accruing pending attendance at a provider re-engagement appointment, the penalty period should be ended using the date immediately prior to the commencement of the pause to mutual obligations in the Review Decision workflow of the relevant failure. See Finalising Community Development Program (CDP) re-engagement requirements. |
4 |
Finalise Serious failures for persistent non-compliance + Read more ... Where a CDP participant with an outstanding Comprehensive Compliance Assessment (CCA) contacts and the participant lives in a region where a formal pause of mutual obligations has been advised, the CCA must be finalised without penalty. The CCA should not be conducted with the CDP participant.
Note: if at the time of contact the CCA has already been completed and a serious failure for persistent non-compliance has been applied, the penalty must be waived from the date the formal pause to mutual obligations was advised. |
5 |
Serious failures for refusing to accept or failing to commence suitable work + Read more ... In Process Direct:
Waiver options When the serious failure has already been applied and the CDP participant is currently serving or is due to commence a serious failure penalty period, the penalty must be waived from the date the formal pause to mutual obligations commences. If a waiver re-engagement appointment cannot be booked within two working days due to the natural disaster/declared emergency/significant event (for example, provider closed), consideration should be given to booking a waiver re-engagement appointment at the first suitable time. If a suitable appointment is not available within 28 days, the serious failure period should be permanently waived. See Waiving a serious failure period. When the failure has been applied and the CDP participant advises they have been personally affected by a natural disaster/declared emergency/significant event, they may be eligible for payment under serious failure hardship provisions if:
|
6 |
Unemployment Non-Payment Periods + Read more ... PST-skilled staff must reject the failure without investigation where mutual obligation requirements were paused for the CDP participant's location regardless of the incident date. In Process Direct:
|
7 |
Waiving an Unemployment Non-Payment Period (UNPP) under UNPP hardship provisions + Read more ... An appropriate level of discretion should be applied when determining whether a CDP participant impacted by a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event is eligible for payment under hardship provisions during a UNPP. For example:
Unless otherwise advised for a specific situation, payment is reinstated under hardship provisions from the date the impacted CDP participant:
It is not appropriate to back date hardship provisions before the CDP participant meets all the above criteria. Where a CDP participant does not meet the criteria for payment under hardship provisions, and is currently serving or yet to commence a UNPP, payment may be continued under Payment Pending Review (PPR) provisions. See Non-compliance with compulsory requirements - review and appeals. |
Targeted Compliance Framework action when a formal pause of mutual obligation requirements has not been advised
Table 3
Item |
Description |
1 |
Mutual obligation failure and work refusal failure participation suspensions + Read more ... Providers are responsible for notifying and managing reconnection requirements when a mutual obligation failure or work refusal failure has been committed and notifying Services Australia when the conditions have been met to lift a participation suspension. Job seekers affected by a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event who have an outstanding participation suspension are required to contact their provider as soon as possible to discuss any impacts on their capacity to comply. When contact with the provider occurs, providers may decide a reconnection requirement will not be notified/needed due to the circumstances. Note: if the job seeker is due to report but is unable to contact their provider because of impacts affecting the provider site, the job seeker should be referred to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) for assistance. |
2 |
Capability Assessment + Read more ... Generally, the Capability Assessment should be completed at the time of initial contact. Any impacts the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event are likely to have on the job seeker's capacity to meet their current requirements on an ongoing basis should be considered and recorded during the Capability Assessment. When the job seeker is due to report and it is not possible or appropriate to complete the Capability Assessment due to the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, the PST staff may ask the job seeker to call back as soon as possible before or on their next reporting day to complete the assessment. In these cases, the job seeker has met the re-engagement requirement to arrange a Capability Assessment once:
Once this has been completed, update the Capability Assessment using Save and Exit reason Unable to complete today to allow:
For the process to Save and Exit a Capability Assessment using reason unable to complete today, see Capability Assessments. |
3 |
Mutual obligation failures + Read more ... The impact of the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event on the job seeker's capacity to comply, including capacity to make prior contact, should be considered as part of a compliance investigation. If a job seeker was unable to comply with a requirement because of a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, their verbal statement provides the required level of evidence to make a determination of reasonable excuse. This includes the impact this may have had on the job seeker's ability to contact prior to an appointment. When the failure event date was before the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event and the job seeker has been personally affected by the situation, consideration should be given to the impacts of applying the failure given the job seeker's current circumstances. In these cases, discretion may be used to reject the failure. Rejecting a failure because of a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event:
See: |
4 |
Unemployment Failures and Work Refusal Failures + Read more ... Generally, the Unemployment Failure or Work Refusal Failure should be completed at the time of initial contact. If an employer cannot be contacted because of the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, evidence provided by the job seeker along with the Employment Separation Certificate (SU1) or participation report needs to be carefully considered. When information from the job seeker conflicts with the information recorded on an SU1, the job seeker's statement should provide enough information to make a determination on the Unemployment Failure. Voluntary unemployment has not occurred if a job seeker left work because they are no longer being paid by their employer because of the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event. When the job seeker is due to report and it is not possible or appropriate to complete the Unemployment Failure or Work Refusal Failure due to the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, Services Australia may temporarily lift the contact trigger allowing the job seeker to report:
Note: when the job seeker is not due to report, and it is not possible or appropriate to complete the Unemployment Failure or Work Refusal Failure, the contact trigger does not need to be temporarily removed. Tell the job seeker to call back as soon as possible or on their reporting day to discuss the non-compliance. |
5 |
Post cancellation non-payment periods and unemployment preclusion periods + Read more ... When payment is cancelled due to persistent mutual obligation failures, an Unemployment Failure or Work Refusal Failure, a post-cancellation preclusion period prevents job seekers who reclaim from immediately returning to payment. When an Unemployment Failure occurred before claim, the new claim start date is affected by an unemployment preclusion period. Advise the job seeker of their appeal rights. For more information, see Non-compliance with compulsory requirements - review and appeals. If the job seeker requests assistance due to hardship, often the most appropriate action is to refer the customer to a welfare agency. A referral for immediate social work crisis intervention may also be appropriate. |
Job Seeker Compliance Framework action when a formal pause of mutual obligation requirements has not been advised
Table 4
Item |
Description |
1 |
Outstanding Non-Attendance Reports (NAR) + Read more ... When a NAR is outstanding, Community Development Program (CDP) participants must be advised to contact their provider after all other outstanding compliance action has been finalised. If the provider is unavailable because of the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, and the CDP participant's payment is suspended, PST staff can manually finalise a NAR. |
2 |
Investigating connection, non-attendance, reconnection and No Show, No Pay failures + Read more ... The assessment of outstanding failures for CDP participants who are personally affected by or are assisting with the recovery effort through a registered organisation should be given priority. This includes CDP participants who have a contact trigger or an automatic payment suspension (participation suspension (APA)). Participation suspensions PST-skilled staff are responsible for lifting a participation suspension (APA) for CDP participants affected by a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event once contact is established and they agree to re-engage. When PST-skilled staff determine re-engagement is not possible or appropriate, payment can be restored. See Finalising Community Development Program (CDP) re-engagement requirements. Failure investigations If a CDP participant was unable to comply with a requirement because of a natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, their verbal statement provides the required level of evidence to make a determination of reasonable excuse, including the impact this may have had on the CDP participant's ability to contact prior to an appointment. When the failure event date was before the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event and the CDP participant has been personally affected by the situation, consideration should be given to the impacts of applying the failure given their current circumstances. In these cases, discretion may be used to reject the failure. Rejecting a failure because of a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event:
See: |
3 |
Re-engaging CDP participants during a disaster or emergency + Read more ... When a compliance investigation, including a Comprehensive Compliance Assessment (CCA), identifies a CDP participant's capacity to comply with mutual obligation requirements has been affected by a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, an exemption from their mutual obligation requirements should be considered. See:
If an exemption has been granted for more than 14 days in the future, a no re-engagement code of RNH - No re-engagement, current exemption, should be recorded. |
4 |
Reconnection failure periods + Read more ... When a CDP participant is subject to a further reconnection requirement arising from the submission of a Provider Appointment Report (PAR), the provider is responsible for managing re-engagement requirements. Where a CDP participant is unable to contact their provider and has a reconnection failure period accruing pending attendance at a provider re-engagement appointment, the penalty period should be ended. See Finalising Community Development Program (CDP) re-engagement requirements. When a CDP participant is unable to comply with a further reconnection requirement due to a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, consider if an exemption from mutual obligation requirements is appropriate. |
5 |
Serious failures for persistent non-compliance + Read more ... CDP participants who contact Services Australia and advise they are affected by a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event and have an outstanding Comprehensive Compliance Assessment (CCA), should have the CCA completed by a CCA Specialist where possible. Where the CDP participant is unable to participate in the CCA due to the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, the CCA Specialist may complete the CCA using information already available on the CDP participant's record. Interventions should include crisis intervention and non-vocational assistance to assist with disaster recovery where appropriate. Where a CCA was unable to be completed because there is insufficient information already available on the CDP participant's record to do so, PST-skilled staff should record that the CCA was not fully undertaken due to the CDP participant being directly impacted and reject the CCA.
Note: rejecting the CCA will ensure the customer is able to lodge while impacted by the significant event. Future instances of non-compliance will re-trigger a CCA. Waiver options When the failure has been applied and a waiver re-engagement appointment cannot be booked within 2 working days due to the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event (for example, provider closed), consideration should be given to booking a waiver re-engagement appointment at the first suitable time. If a suitable appointment is not available within 28 days, the serious failure period should be permanently waived. See Waiving a serious failure period. When the failure has been applied and the CDP participant advises they have been personally affected, they may be eligible for payment under serious failure hardship provisions if:
|
6 |
Serious failures for refusing to accept or failing to commence suitable work + Read more ... If a CDP participant refuses to accept or fails to commence a suitable job offer due to a disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, reasonable excuse provisions will apply. The CDP participant's statement about how the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event affected their ability to accept or commence the job should provide enough information to make a determination unless there is reason to doubt their statement. When reasonable excuse is established, the serious failure should be rejected. When the serious failure event occurred prior to the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, a serious failure will need to be investigated. However, in cases where a CDP participant has been personally affected, consideration should be given to the impacts of applying the failure given their current circumstances. In these cases, discretion may be used to reject the failure using the most appropriate rejection reason. See Rejecting a compliance action. Waiver options When the failure has been applied and a waiver re-engagement appointment cannot be booked within two working days due to the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event (for example, provider closed), consideration should be given to booking a waiver re-engagement appointment at the first suitable time. If a suitable appointment is not available within 28 days, the serious failure period should be permanently waived. See Waiving a serious failure period. When the failure has been applied and the CDP participant advises they have been personally affected, they may be eligible for payment under serious failure hardship provisions if:
|
7 |
Investigating Unemployment Non-Payment Period (UNPP) + Read more ... Any outstanding UNPP investigations should be investigated. Generally, the UNPP should be completed at the time of initial contact. If an employer cannot be contacted because of the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, evidence provided by the CDP participant along with the Employment Separation Certificate (SU1) or participation report needs to be considered. When information from the CDP participant conflicts with the information recorded on the SU1, the CDP participant's statement should provide enough information to make a determination on the UNPP. Voluntary unemployment has not occurred if a CDP participant left work because they are no longer being paid by their employer because of the disaster, declared emergency or other significant event. When the CDP participant is due to report and it is not possible or appropriate to complete the UNPP due to the natural disaster, declared emergency or other significant event, Services Australia may temporarily lift the contact trigger allowing the CDP participant to report:
When a decision is made to apply a UNPP, the CDP participant's eligibility to have the UNPP ended under the hardship provisions should be assessed. |
8 |
Waiving a UNPP under UNPP hardship provisions + Read more ... An appropriate level of discretion should be applied when determining whether a CDP participant is eligible for payment under hardship provisions during a UNPP and has been impacted by a disaster or declared emergency. For example, when a CDP participant:
Unless otherwise advised for a specific situation, payment is reinstated under hardship provisions from the date the impacted CDP participant:
It is not appropriate to back date hardship provisions before the CDP participant meets all the above criteria. See Unemployment due to a voluntary act or misconduct. Where a CDP participant does not meet the criteria for payment under hardship provisions, and is currently serving or yet to commence a UNPP, payment may be continued under Payment Pending Review (PPR) provisions. See Non-compliance with compulsory requirements - review and appeals. |