Single Touch Payroll (STP) - Employer reconciliation 277-24011011
This document explains the processing of STP pay event submissions for reconciliation of child support deductions and child support garnishees.
On this page:
Employer and employee mismatch
Auto assign of pay date and pay cycle
Action after reviewing and actioning mismatches
STP new reporter
Table 1
Step |
Action |
1 |
STP new reporter + Read more ... The STP new reporter intray generates when an employer first starts using STP to report child support deductions/garnishees for their employees. To action the intray, review all information reported in the STP submission. This increases the likelihood of successful future auto reconciliation. STP data To review the STP data, from the organisation:
The STP mismatch list will display the STP submissions with exception errors. If there are no exception errors the STP submission will auto finalise to the reconciliation report list with an ERR status of INIT. Note: only the latest 3 months is displayed, if no information displays, use the Mismatch List Find to extend the pay date range (twelve months is the maximum range that can be entered). Employer mismatch errors and warnings To review the employer mismatch errors and warnings:
Highlight the pay date with submission lodgement status of EXCEPTION ERROR. Select Mismatches This will open the Employer Mismatches and display the warning and errors for the employer. For all STP New Reporters the employer mismatch list will display the employer mismatch of Employer has commenced reporting through STP. Check YTD Amounts are correct. This is an active warning mismatch, check this warning before creating the ERR. To action, see Table 3, Step 14. Employee mismatch errors and warnings To review the employee mismatch errors and warnings:
Double click the pay date with submission lodgement status of EXCEPTION ERROR to open the STP Mismatch Summary. If no customers are viewable, an Information Detail box will display ‘No Records Found’ select OK. This indicates there are no customers with a mismatch. If there are customers listed:
This will open the employee mismatches and display the warning and errors for the highlighted customer. Repeat this for each customer reported by the employer. To action Employee mismatches, see Table 4. |
2 |
Review and action employer and employee mismatch errors and warning messages + Read more ... Child support deductions reported through STP have exception treatments. The exception treatments prevent auto reconciliation where there are inconsistencies and errors. These are identified by error and warning messages. The error and warnings will appear at the employer and employee levels when:
Before updating the submission lodgement status to READY FOR ERR to create the Employer Reconciliation Report (ERR) Service Officers must investigate and action all 3 types of mismatches:
Mismatches with a status of error will prevent the ERR creating. Where employer contact is needed to confirm information, see Table 2, Step 3 Note: pay events without mismatches, are visible in the STP Data Submission windows. To review and action: |
Employer and employee mismatch
Table 2
Step |
Action |
1 |
Mismatch types + Read more ... Before creating the Employer Reconciliation Report (ERR) Service Officers must investigate and action all 3 types of mismatches:
Mismatches with a status of error will prevent the ERR creating. Note: pay events without mismatches, are visible in the STP Data Submission windows. |
2 |
Display mismatch errors and warnings + Read more ... Select the mismatch error and warning to display. Employer mismatch errors and warnings + Read more ... To review the employer mismatch errors and warnings, from the Organisation window:
To review and action employer mismatches, see Table 3. Employee mismatch errors and warnings + Read more ... To review the employee mismatch errors and warnings. From the Organisation window:
Double click the pay date submission lodgement status of EXCEPTION ERROR to open the STP Mismatch Summary window. The STP Mismatch Summary only displays customers with exception errors as the default display. To view all customers in the submission, untick the Filter Customer STP Payevent Details box in the General Details section of the STP Mismatch Summary window. Highlight the customer. Select mismatches. This displays the warning and errors for the employee. Repeat this for each employee reported by the employer. To review and action employee mismatches, see Table 4. |
3 |
Prepare to contact employer + Read more ... Review all employer and employee mismatches before contacting the employer. This will help to resolve all mismatches in one conversation. Service Officers must:
If the Organisation Contact window does not list a contact name, confirm the appropriate contact details with the employer and update Cuba. Note: when speaking to an employer do not divulge payer information to anyone except the known payroll contact person or, in their absence, a colleague dealing with payroll. To review and action: |
Employer mismatch
Table 3
Mismatch |
Description and action |
1 |
Pay date reported for this employer is different to the expected Pay Date in Cuba + Read more ... Contact the employer to confirm the pay date/pay cycle. Pay date/ pay cycle is incorrect
If the employer cannot amend their reporting, see Table 5. Employer has reported in the incorrect field for the deduction type
Check that the employer has reported in the correct deduction field for the customer notice that is in place. If the employer reported in the incorrect deduction field, contact the employer to ask them to update their reporting. This includes updating the year-to-date (YTD) reporting by transferring the YTD data from the Child Support Deduction field to the Child Support Garnishee field or vice versa. |
2 |
More than one employee in submission and at least one with no EW link/s72a Notice + Read more ... Check if a recently delinked customer has been reported or a customer with a withdrawn s72A garnishee has been reported and final payment/s have been received.
Contact the employer to:
Check if the employer withholding status is ‘EW not appropriate’, if Yes, clear the link. |
3 |
No current EW link or s72A notice and only one employee in submission + Read more ... This mismatch creates when either:
Contact the employer to find out which organisation ABN the employee should be linked to. A delink and relink may be needed. To reconcile the deduction/s reported in the STP submission, update the:
|
4 |
First STP report from this employer for s72A notices + Read more ... Review S72A notice Section 72A notices are trackable if the notice is issued after the organisation started STP reporting for that customer/s. An STP s72A UPDATE NOTICE RQD intray alerts the Service Officer to review the s72A customer. Investigate if there is still an active s72A garnishee notice with the employer for the employee/s listed in the intray. If the customer has no debt and the s72A notice is:
If the customer has debt, ES will:
Action needed
|
5 |
The pay date has been previously reported but ERR is not at REC + Read more ... This can occur for an STP New Reporter, when the employer reports a pay date where Cuba has already created an ERR that includes the pay date reported by the employer. Delete the pay date/s reported via STP from the MANUAL ERR. This will enable the STP submission to be actioned. Documentation must be added to the STP Reconciliation template to explain why the pay date/s was deleted from the manual ERR. Record a document using the suggested text: Pay Date/s XX/XX/XX for employee/s XXXX deleted from manual ERR (EMP Rec no.XXXXX) to enable STP submission to be actioned. This can occur when a duplicate report is received for a pay date already reported and the ERR for that pay date is not reconciled. See Resources page, Table 2, Item 3. |
6 |
No Child Support deduction for this employee(s) linked for EW/EWA included in the STP submission + Read more ... For any employee/s not reported, a warning message will populate before navigating to the STP Mismatch Summary window to check employee mismatches. To view the notepad, select Cancel to the warning message. The notepad Subject heading will display as EWNR, and the notepad will provide a list of expected deductions not reported for each employee. The notepad will include the following details:
For each employee not reported, the actual amount will derive as zero as there will be no reported YTD. The deduction variation reason will display as STPN. Action needed
If the employer confirms that they reported the deduction, see Table 9 in Single Touch Payroll (STP) – Issue management. |
7 |
There is a pay date reporting gap between submissions. Check YTD + Read more ... The inability to derive correctly can occur if there is a gap between reporting pay dates. This occurs when the employer:
Contact the employer to confirm the deduction where derivation has not occurred. |
8 |
Pay date has been reported more than 9 days in advance + Read more ... Employer has reported for a pay date more than 9 days in advance. Expand the date range to view. |
9 |
Amount of Withholding Exceeds Gross Payments + Read more ... The employer has deducted more than the gross amount earned by the employee. Contact the employer to confirm the deduction amount. |
10 |
Employer Submission has one ABN, but multiple CSRN submissions have been reported by this ABN + Read more ... Check the ABN in Cuba and whether the employee reported is on one of the other associated employers. Confirm with the employer which CSRN is correct before deciding to assign the submission. See Table 5 in Single Touch Payroll (STP) – Issue Management. |
11 |
This ABN is not the Employer recorded in Cuba + Read more ... This warning is due to the employer transitioning to STP Phase 2 Reporting. No action needed. |
12 |
Pay date has been previously reported but the amounts are the same + Read more ... A submission has been lodged for a pay date already reconciled in Cuba.
|
13 |
A pay date submission cancellation has been received + Read more ... The employer has cancelled the STP submission. Contact the employer to understand why they cancelled the event. Ask them how/why they cancelled the STP submission? Funds have been transferred or top up used + Read more ... Are the funds available on the customer account and not been disbursed to the other parent?
See Table 8 in Employer withholding reconciliation and top up. Funds not transferred or top up not used + Read more ... The ERR for the CANCELLED STP submission is at INIT status. Has there been a deduction made?
|
14 |
Employer has commenced reporting through STP. Check YTD amounts are correct + Read more ... The derivation for the YTD is needed. To derive the deduction, the reported YTD can be balanced to the reconciled plus expected deductions for that financial year. Example: Employer A has reported their first STP submission for pay date 01/08/24 for employee B. The actual deduction derived is $250.00, the Total Submitted Amount is $50.00, and the reported YTD is $250.00. Cuba has derived the actual deduction as $250.00 as there was no previous YTD amount to subtract from the reported YTD. Employee B had $200.00 reconciled for July 2024 pay dates plus the expected deduction for pay date 01/08/24 is $50.00. This equals $250.00 which balances to the reported YTD for pay date 01/08/2024. The actual deduction can be corrected from the reported YTD of $250.00 to $50.00 which balances to the Total Submitted Amount on the submission. Document the source of the YTD and how the figure was calculated in the STP Reconciliation template in the Derivation field. Contact the employer if unable to match the YTD figure in Cuba with the details the employer reported. Ask the employer for a break-up of the deduction amounts for the STP pay date including any unreconciled pay dates. |
15 |
Pay date previously reported and ERR is at REC but amounts differ + Read more ... The employer has lodged a submission for a reconciled pay date and the amount submitted is different to the reconciled amount. Contact the employer to discuss the variation. Determine if the ERR needs to be adjusted. ERR needs to be adjusted upwards:
Note: if funds are not available for use, top up cannot be used before the second Wednesday of the month. ERR needs to be adjusted downwards:
Where the customer is no longer employed, and the employer error has led to a mistaken disbursement there are limited circumstances where the error can be corrected via a Consolidated Revenue Debt submission. When considering the use of consolidated revenue funds to correct an error the individual circumstances of the case and facts of what occurred is considered in every instance. Seek SSO help when a consolidated revenue submission is needed. See Table 8 in Employer withholding reconciliation and top up. |
16 |
Possible full file replacement submission has been received for a previous submission + Read more ... The full file replacement will appear as a possible duplicate pay date. One of the pay events in the submission will display a status of CANCELLED, the other will display a status of ACTIVE. They will both be for the same employee, disregard the CANCELLED pay event. Once all other mismatches have been actioned, set the STP submission to READY FOR ERR for the ACTIVE pay event. |
17 |
Pay date is flagged for exception handling + Read more ... This occurs when a STP Pay Date Exception is keyed in the STP Pay Date Exception window. This adds a FLAG PAYD indicator on the employer. When this indicator is added, all STP data is sent to the STP Mismatch List window and has a status of EXCEPTION ERROR. Use the FLAG PAYD indicator when either a specific pay date, or a selection of pay dates in the future need to be put aside for exception handling. Where the pay date/s no longer need to be put aside for exception handling the indicator end date must be updated to the current date. |
18 |
This employer has been marked as ‘Insolvent’ please check submission + Read more ... The employer’s indicator has been updated to Insolvent. Contact the employer to confirm deduction information. Check if the employees have ceased employment and end Employer Withholding and/or withdraw s72A. Use the Insolvency referral macro to refer the employer to the Debt Liquidation Officer. |
19 |
Employers total submitted amount is different to the employee total actual amounts + Read more ... This occurs when;
Before contacting the employer to confirm the deduction/s, check the
|
20 |
There are errors and warnings listed for submission in the DG window + Read more ... Check the STP DG Errors and Warnings window. See STP Digital Gateway errors and warnings on the Resources page. |
Employee mismatch
Table 4
Step |
Description and action |
1 |
Derived amount for the employee does not equal expected amount in Cuba and no reason code + Read more ... This may occur if:
This mismatch in most instances will occur when an employer first reports, as derivation is unable to occur automatically. Find out the actual deduction by:
If the employee/s identity does not match in the Employee Mismatch List:
|
2 |
Derived amount for the employee does not equal expected amount in Cuba and incorrect reason code has applied + Read more ... This is a known error. If this occurs, SSO needs to lodge an SD via mySupport using the Cuba Application and Child Support System Issues form. Suggested text: Subject: STP Employer - Variation Reason Code has incorrectly derived Text: STP variation code (PEA/CAS/NEM) should not have applied as there was a variation between the YTD and previous actual amount. |
3 |
The name for the employee in Cuba is different to the name in the submission + Read more ... Check the STP data submission window to confirm the name provided in the STP report and check the Match Outcome of the employee. To view the Match Outcome and match score of the employee, in the STP Mismatch Summary window:
See Single Touch Payroll (STP) - Match outcomes These checks may help:
Check the other particulars match such as the employee’s:
Check:
If satisfied despite the name mismatch, the STP data is reported for the correct customer:
Subject: STP Mismatch - Name Details Details: Name in STP data: Name on Cuba: Employer has confirmed this is the employee's name on their records and all further STP submissions will be submitted with this name. Or Name updated by employer, who has confirmed a typographical error had occurred, all future STP submissions should match the Cuba record.
If it appears the name mismatch is an error made by the employer, check:
If the employer has not been contacted in the past, contact the employer to ask them to update the spelling of the name to prevent this mismatch happening again. Do not contact the employer continuously for each STP pay event. Note: as EW does not accommodate aliases, and the legal notices must be correct, refer to a SSO in these circumstances to determine if the employee should be linked. The SSO can refer the issue to the site PSM who can email National ICS, if needed. If the name discrepancy needs investigating, including ICP checks, customer contact etc. Refer to the customer owning office for follow-up in line with CMA.
|
4 |
Payment period start/end dates (pay cycle) for this employee do not match Cuba dates + Read more ... Check the current pay cycles and pay date in Cuba for this employer. If there is more than one active pay cycle listed, check to make sure they are needed.
There may be instances when the pay cycle cannot be matched, due to software issues. If the employer cannot amend their reporting, see Table 5. |
5 |
STP payroll ID for employee has a previous payroll ID listed in the submission + Read more ... Some employers may have created new payroll IDs from the start of STP reporting. Check notepads relating to previous contact with employer about payroll IDs. If there are no notes:
Note: payroll IDs that are generally 20 characters long, numerical, alphabetical and include symbols will not fit into Cuba. They appear to be a long alphanumeric combination e.g., 46EX11AM-PL12E-402F-ABC-4F13B62122ED. This indicates the employer is not using any payroll IDs. In these instances:
Employees with active garnishee notices (s72A) in place, do not have payroll IDs and will continue to mismatch. |
6 |
STP payroll ID for employee matches another employee with the same employer + Read more ... This may indicate the employer has made an error when submitting the data and not updated payroll ID for each linked employee.
|
7 |
STP payroll ID for employee does not match any employee in Cuba with the same employer + Read more ... This may indicate:
Check notepads relating to previous contact with the employer about payroll IDs, to work out if this is an ongoing issue.
Note: payroll IDs that are generally 20 characters long, numerical, alphabetical and include symbols will not fit into Cuba. They appear to be a long alphanumeric combination e.g., 46EX11AM-PL12E-402F-ABC-4F13B62122ED. This indicates the employer is not using any payroll IDs. In these instances:
Employees with active garnishee notices (s72A) in place, do not have payroll IDs and will continue to mismatch. |
8 |
A periodic S72A has been reported for employee and is greater than the $10 monthly tolerance + Read more ... Check the employer has reported the amount as a garnishee (s72A) and the amount received matches the expected periodic amount. If the amount received does not match the expected periodic amount, contact the employer:
Document the discussion with the employer in the STP Reconciliation template for that STP pay date reported. Note: PEA does not apply for s72A notices. |
9 |
No valid TFN reported for this employee + Read more ... Check:
If not satisfied the details of the employee are correct, refer to the customer owning office for follow-up in line with CMA.
|
10 |
Employee exists in another ERR with same employer/pay date + Read more ... Check to see if the reported pay date has been reconciled to a payment. This can occur if the payment is received and matches before the STP submission is received, see Table 6 in Single Touch Payroll (STP) – Issue management. If not, check the:
Check the reported YTD and the previous YTD figures. If there is a difference, note how much that amount is and check to see if it has been used in an ERR. This may indicate the employee is linked to the incorrect employer (perhaps an associated employer). If so, contact the employer, to confirm the correct organisation ABN the employee should be linked to. If the customer is linked to the incorrect employer, delink and relink the customer. Note: long term use of DUPL/DUPZ must not occur. |
11 |
A link/notice exists but not for the reported deduction type + Read more ... This may occur if the employer has selected the incorrect deduction type to report child support deduction/s. Employers must select:
Check and investigate the notice in place for the employee/s. Contact the employer to explain:
Ask the employer to update their reporting to report in the correct field from the following pay date, including updating the YTD reporting to the correct field. The employer may need to contact their software provider if they are unsure how to correct this. Document the conversation in the STP Mismatch List window. This notepad will automatically transfer to the ERR when it is created. The Switch function is used to correct link/notice:
Once the switch function is used for an employee, they cannot be switched back. If a Switch is needed:
|
12 |
This employee is reported with a negative deduction amount + Read more ... Contact the employer to discuss the variation and why they reported a negative amount. This can occur when the reported YTD is less than the previous YTD, resulting in a negative deduction amount being derived. Contact the employer to confirm the correct deduction amount. Note: a negative deduction amount can occur when the employer submits the pay events out of pay date/pay cycle sequence, therefore it is important to check the pay period reported in the STP Data Submission. |
Auto assign of pay date and pay cycle
Table 5
Step |
Action |
1 |
Auto assign of pay dates and pay cycles + Read more ... When Cuba receives an STP submission, it will check for pay date and pay cycle misalignment and automatically update the pay date on the submission to align with the expected Cuba pay date, if certain criteria is met. |
2 |
STP Pay Date Auto Assigned + Read more ... The STP pay date auto assigned intray will create when Cuba has addressed the pay date exception by auto assigning the STP submission to the expected pay date in Cuba Contact the employer to confirm the correct pay date/pay cycle. Pay date/pay cycle is incorrect
If the employer is unable to update/amend the pay date pay date due to an ongoing/known issue:
To add the STP pay date misalignment indicator:
This will create the STP Pay Date Indic Review Req intray. The review date for this intray defaults to current date + 12 months. When this date is reached contact the employer. Is the employer able to update\amend the pay date?
Note: when the date is reached, the intray will only appear in the Service Officers intray list. Before this date, the intrays will appear on the employer. |
3 |
STP Pay Cycle Misalignment + Read more ... The STP pay cycle misalignment intray will create when Cuba has addressed the pay cycle exception. Contact the employer to confirm the correct pay cycle. Pay cycle is incorrect
If the employer is unable to update\amend the pay cycle due to an ongoing\known issue:
To add the STP pay date misalignment indicator:
This creates an STP Pay Date Indic Review Req intray. The review date for this intray defaults to current date + 12 months. When this date is reached contact the employer. Is the employer able to update/amend the pay date?
Note: when the date is reached, the intray will only appear in the Service Officers intray list. Before this date, the intrays will appear on the employer. |
Action after reviewing and actioning mismatches
Table 6
Step |
Action |
1 |
Derived amount is different to the expected amount + Read more ... STP data from the ATO does not have reason codes. Where possible Services Australia data team create reason codes based on the STP data received from the ATO. Select the reporter. Subsequent STP reporter + Read more ... For subsequent STP reporters, the following reasons codes are derived:
Note: employers are not able to enter deduction variation reasons when submitting a pay event via STP. Where the derived amount is different to the expected amount, and a reason code has not auto derived, contact the employer to confirm the reason for the variation. After confirming the reason for the difference, select the appropriate reason code from the reasons dropdown menu in the STP Mismatch Summary window for the relevant customer/s to explain the discrepancy. First time reporters + Read more ... For first time STP reporters, the derivation of the deduction will not occur. Check the reported STP YTD amount to manually derive the actual deduction for each customer. To derive the deduction, the reported YTD can be balanced to the reconciled plus expected deductions for that financial year. Example: Employer A has reported their first STP submission for pay date 01/08/24 for employee B. The actual deduction derived is $250.00, the Total Submitted Amount is $50.00, and the reported YTD is $250.00. Cuba has derived the actual deduction as $250.00 as there was no previous YTD amount to subtract from the reported YTD. Employee B had $200.00 reconciled for July 2024 pay dates plus the expected deduction for pay date 01/08/24 is $50.00. This equals $250.00 which balances to the reported YTD for pay date 01/08/2024. The actual deduction can be corrected from the reported YTD of $250.00 to $50.00 which balances to the Total Submitted Amount on the submission. Contact the employer if unable to match the YTD figure in Cuba with the details the employer reported. Ask the employer for a break-up of the deduction amounts for the STP pay date including any unreconciled pay dates. If the amount reported for each employee is different to the expected amount, confirm the reason with the employer. Before updating the submission lodgement status to ERR:
When the status moves to FINALISED, the ERR is created. |
2 |
Match outcomes + Read more ... For the accuracy of the reconciliation and customer matching, all Match Outcomes other than ‘M’ need investigation and follow-up. Where the actual/derived amount for a customer is $0.00, however, the reported YTD and previous YTD have changed, the match outcome for the customer must be checked as Cuba is not able to derive the deduction amount when there is no match for the customer To review and action Match Outcomes, see Single Touch Payroll (STP) - Match outcomes. |
3 |
STP Split Submissions – Employer Withholding + Read more ... A split submission is when multiple STP submissions are received for the same employer, for the same pay date for all employee’s they deduct child support for. Cuba functionality only allows for one EW submission to be finalised to the Reconciliation Report List per pay date. When STP EW split submissions are received the Digitally Enabled Process (DEP) will attempt to merge multiple submissions into one submission. See Table 2 in Single Touch Payroll (STP) - Issue management. Note: Section 72A deduction type submissions are not included in the merging process. When the DEP is unable to merge split submissions manually merge the child support deductions into one submission. Update the other submission/s reported for the same pay date to RECORD ONLY and document in the STP Mismatch List notepad using the STP Reconciliation template > Record only. |
4 |
STP Update Events + Read more ... An update event is a correction to a submission previously made to Child Support. There are 3 types of STP update events:
Update events help to reduce the creation of consolidated revenue debt and/or mismatched data. For the accuracy of the reconciliation, investigate all update events. To investigate and action update events see Single Touch Payroll (STP) - Update events. Cancelled events and Full File Replacements Cancelled events occur when some pay events in the same STP submission are cancelled and a new submission is received for the same pay date. The STP Submission status will display as CANCELLED and needs investigating. A Full File Replacement allows an employer to replace an entire submission if they make a substantial error when reporting. An STP RECONCILIATION REVIEW intray will create with details of the replaced submission. This intray is created to differentiate between a Cancelled Event and a Full File Replacement. |
5 |
End the STP Reporter indicator + Read more ... The STP Reporter indicator can be ended when an employer confirms they are no longer reporting deductions through STP. An employer may stop reporting through STP when they;
Note: if an employer asks to go back to reporting online, add the online reconciliation channel preference. Updating the channel preference will allow the employer to submit deduction amounts via CSBOS. Change the CSBOS channel preference From the Organisation window:
The preferred product channels list box shows the channel preference the employer is currently using. Update the channel preference From the Products and Services dropdown menu:
After saving:
Do not end the STP Reporter indicator if:
To end the STP reported indicator From the Organisation window:
After ending the STP reporter indicator, Cuba will automatically create the monthly ERR on the first day of every month where the employer has linked customers, and unreconciled pay dates in the previous month. |
Cessation
Table 7
Step |
Action |
1 |
Cessation advice provided by employers through STP + Read more ... There are 2 triggers to know a payer is no longer employed (NEM):
When cessation notification is received via the STP Customer Cessation Advice intray, check the intray notepad to identify the submission ID and pay date the cessation advice is reported in. The intray notepad includes:
|
2 |
View cessation date and cessation reason + Read more ... The cessation date and reason are displayed on the View STP Details List window. To go to the STP Details List window:
The STP Data Submission List will display.
The View STP Detail List window will display. To view the Cessation Date and Cessation Reason, scroll to the right in the STP record Details group box. Scroll across, to view the code as below. If the Cessation Code = R, T, I, F, V, C or D set the variation reason to NOTEMP. There are different codes for varying reasons as follows;
If the Cessation Code is D and date of death is within the pay event submission, an STP CESSATION DECEASED ADVICE intray create automatically on the employer record and the customer record, with a review date of 2 days. The intray on the customer’s record automatically routes to the Deceased Customers Team to action as a high priority. If the Cessation Code is R, T, I, F, V or C, an STP CUSTOMER CESSATION ADVICE intray creates automatically on the relevant employer record, with a review date of 7 days. |
3 |
Action customer cessation advice + Read more ... After viewing the cessation date and cessation reason in the submission, check the NEM reason code has auto derived, if not, adjust the reason code for the customer/s from the reason dropdown menu in the STP Mismatch Summary window. A reason code is needed if the actual amount is different to the expected amount and Cuba has not auto derived the NEM reason code. Before updating the submission lodgement status to READY FOR ERR:
When the status moves to FINALISED, the ERR is created. Delink the customer and document the cessation details in the Employer Withholding (linking) macro. Add the document to the Employer Relationship window notepad. If the cessation reason reported by the employer is EMPLOYER INITATED – TRANSFER the employee has ceased employment and transferred to another employer who is part of a franchise/associated entity, contact the employer to confirm the new ABN and employment details for a relink. If the new ABN is associated, lock the organisations and report as associated following the How to report associated employer process. After actioning the customer cessation advise, delete the STP CUSTOMER CESSATION ADVICE intray. Action any follow up work generated as a result of actioning the cessation notification, in accordance with the Customer Management Approach (CMA). |
Bundling pay dates
Table 8
Step |
Action |
1 |
Bundling + Read more ...
|
2 |
Advantages of bundling + Read more ...
|
3 |
To bundle + Read more ... To summarise the bundled ERRs into one ERR:
|
4 |
Document + Read more ...
In the bundled ERR notepad document that:
|